Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
LXD vs VirtualBox: What are the differences?
Introduction
LXD and VirtualBox are both virtualization technologies that allow users to create and manage virtual machines. However, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.
Containerization vs. Hypervisor: LXD is a containerization technology that uses Linux Containers (LXC) to create lightweight and isolated environments. On the other hand, VirtualBox is a hypervisor-based virtualization solution that emulates complete hardware to run virtual machines.
Operating System Compatibility: LXD requires the host system to be running a Linux kernel, as it relies on Linux Containers. It can run different distributions of Linux, but it may not support other operating systems such as Windows. VirtualBox, on the other hand, is compatible with a wide range of operating systems, including various versions of Linux, Windows, macOS, and Solaris.
Resource Utilization: LXD offers better resource utilization compared to VirtualBox. As LXD uses containerization, it shares the host system's kernel and resources with the containers, resulting in lower overhead. VirtualBox, being a hypervisor, requires separate virtual machine instances with their own operating systems, taking up more resources.
Networking: LXD provides a more advanced networking setup compared to VirtualBox. It supports advanced networking features, such as bridging, VLANs, and network namespaces. VirtualBox, while offering basic networking configurations, may not have the same level of flexibility and control as LXD.
Performance: LXD generally offers better performance than VirtualBox, especially when it comes to I/O-intensive workloads. LXD containers can achieve near-native performance as they share the host system's kernel. VirtualBox, on the other hand, has a layer of virtualization between the guest and host operating systems, which may introduce some performance overhead.
Use Case: LXD is primarily designed for running Linux-based applications and services in production environments. It provides a lightweight and scalable solution for deploying and managing containers. VirtualBox, on the other hand, is more suited for desktop and development use cases, allowing users to run various operating systems and applications for testing and development purposes.
In summary, LXD and VirtualBox differ in their underlying technologies, operating system compatibility, resource utilization, networking capabilities, performance, and use cases.
lxd/lxc and Docker aren't congruent so this comparison needs a more detailed look; but in short I can say: the lxd-integrated administration of storage including zfs with its snapshot capabilities as well as the system container (multi-process) approach of lxc vs. the limited single-process container approach of Docker is the main reason I chose lxd over Docker.
Pros of LXD
- More simple10
- Open Source8
- API8
- Best8
- Cluster7
- Multiprocess isolation (not single)5
- Fast5
- I like the goal of the LXD and found it to work great5
- Full OS isolation4
- Container3
- More stateful than docker3
- Systemctl compatibility2
Pros of VirtualBox
- Free358
- Easy231
- Default for vagrant169
- Fast110
- Starts quickly73
- Open-source45
- Running in background42
- Simple, yet comprehensive41
- Default for boot2docker27
- Extensive customization22
- Free to use3
- Mouse integration2
- Easy tool2
- Cross-platform2